A new two-terminal passive circuit element-called the
Memristor (short for memory resistor) characterized by a relationship between
the charge and the flux linkage is introduced as the fourth basic circuit
element. Another
way of describing a memristor is that it is any passive two-terminal circuit
elements that maintains a functional relationship between the time
integral of current (called charge) and the time integral of voltage (called flux). The slope of this function is called the memristance M and is similar to variable resistance.
The reason that the memristor is radically different from the other fundamental
circuit elements is that, unlike them, it carries a memory of its past. When
you turn off the voltage to the circuit, the memristor still remembers how much
was applied before and for how long. That's an effect that can't be duplicated
by any circuit combination of resistors, capacitors, and inductors, which is
why the memristor qualifies as a fundamental circuit element.
The history of
memristor starts nearly four decades ago with a nonlinear-circuit-theory
pioneer Leon Chua. Examining the relationships between charge and flux in
resistors, capacitors, and inductors in a 1971 paper, Chua postulated the
existence of a fourth element called the memory resistor. Such a device, he
figured, would provide a similar relationship between magnetic flux and charge
that a resistor gives between voltage and current. In practice, that would mean
it acted like a resistor whose value could vary according to the current
passing through it and which would remember that value even after the current
disappeared. The four circuit quantities (charge,
current, voltage, and magnetic flux) can be related to each other in six ways.
Two quantities are covered by basic physical laws, and three are covered by
known circuit elements (resistor, capacitor, and inductor). That leaves one
possible relation unaccounted for. Based on this realization, Chua proposed the
memristor purely for the mathematical aesthetics of it, as a class of circuit
element based on a relationship between charge and flux.
The memristor is essentially a two-terminal variable
resistor, with resistance dependent upon the amount of charge q that
has passed between the terminals.
Where M can be defined in terms of differential equation
as,
.
Now, 37 years later, electronics have
finally gotten small enough to reveal the secrets of that fourth element.
Hewlett-Packard senior fellow Stanley Williams and his group were working on
molecular electronics when they started to notice strange behavior in their
devices similar as postulated by L. Chua. A solid-state device could have the
characteristics of a memristor based on the behavior of nanoscale thin films. The device neither uses magnetic flux as the
theoretical memristor suggested, nor do stores charge as a capacitor does, but
instead achieves a resistance dependent on the history of current. The HP
device is composed of a thin (50 nm) titanium
dioxide film between two 5 nm thick electrodes, one Ti, the other Pt. Initially, there are two layers to
the titanium dioxide film, one of which has a slight depletion of oxygen atoms.
The oxygen vacancies act as charge carriers, meaning that the depleted layer has a much lower
resistance than the non-depleted layer. When an electric field is applied, the
oxygen vacancies drift (see Fast
ion conductor), changing the boundary between the high-resistance and
low-resistance layers. Thus the resistance of the film as a whole is dependent
on how much charge has been passed through it in a particular direction, which
is reversible by changing the direction of current. Since the HP device displays fast ion
conduction at nanoscale, it is considered as a nanoionic device.
Spin Torque Transfer MRAM is a well-known device that exhibits memristive behavior.
The resistance is dependent on the relative spin orientation between two sides
of a magnetic tunnel
junction. This in turn can be controlled by the spin
torque induced by the current flowing through the junction. However, the length
of time the current flows through the junction determines the amount of current
needed. But still we are waiting for a purely memristive device. In October 2011, the HP team announced
the commercial availability of memristor technology within 18 months, as a
replacement for Flash, SSD, DRAM and SRAM.
The main
reason why it is going to replace previous memory devices is that memristor
never forgets. The memristor's memory has consequences: the reason computers
have to be rebooted every time they are turned on is that their logic circuits
are incapable of holding their bits after the power is shut off. But because a
memristor can remember voltages, a memristor-driven computer would arguably never
need a reboot. one could leave all his Word files and spreadsheets open, turn
off your computer, and go for a break, When he comes back, turn on his computer
and everything is instantly on the screen exactly the way he left it.
By
redesigning certain types of circuits to include memristors same computing
function can be obtained with fewer components, making the circuit itself less
expensive and significantly decreasing its power consumption. In fact,
combination of memristors with traditional circuit-design elements to produce a
device that does computation in a non-Boolean fashion. According to R. Stanley Williams of Hewlett Packard memristor based
device development team ”We won't claim that we're
going to build a brain, but we want something that will compute like a brain”.
They think they can abstract ”the whole synapse idea” to do essentially analog computation in an
efficient manner. ”Some things that would take a digital computer forever to
do, an analog computer would just breeze through”. The HP group is also looking
at developing a memristor-based nonvolatile memory. A memory based on
memristors could be 1000 times faster than magnetic disks and use much less
power.
In short
we can say that this fourth basic electric circuit element can take our today’s
computing to next level making it much faster, reliable and energy efficient.
No comments:
Post a Comment